Access Digital Health
CountriesSignalsInterventionsToolsAbout
Log in
← Interventions

Screening with mammography for breast cancer

Cost-effectiveness — what published models estimate per unit of health impact
$/DALY
$583–833
WHO-CHOICE modeled
GiveWell
—
no GiveWell model
CE sources
2
Tier A · 85 studies
Source agreement
comparable
within 2.5×
Loading effectiveness evidence…
Cost-effectiveness

Estimates are sourced in their native units and shown for comparison, not as literal costs. Sources use different frameworks — see each card for what it represents and how it was derived.

Modeled benchmarks ($/DALY)Tier A · standardized benchmark
South-East Asia$833.00View source →
Eastern sub-Saharan Africa$583.00View source →

WHO-CHOICE estimates are modeled at population-level population coverage, compared against the null set (no intervention) under generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. View WHO-CHOICE methodology →

$/DALY sources within 2.5x - treat as comparable, not ranked.

Modeled regional estimates — not realized delivery costs.

Published study estimates ($/DALY)Tier B · context only

Tufts GHCEA · 85 studies, varied methods — explore the spread, not a single number.

Health-system
$5,808
median · n=84
Mixed
$90,771
median · n=1
Filter the cohort
$5,864median of 85 studies · IQR $4,582–$7,205 · 1 cost-saving
Data completeness: not assessed (no country selected) · Evidence confidence: not assessed (no country selected)
Delivery readiness is country-specific. Select a country in the selector above to see its health-system context — workforce density, financing mix, service coverage.
The figures above are published benchmarks. To build an investment case for your own context — local unit costs, target population, coverage assumptions — model it directly. Select a country first to carry its context into the model.
Choose a country to model →
Looking for supply/market data for Screening with mammography for breast cancer? Select a country above, then open its intelligence page.