Combination therapy for prevention of CVD in those with 30%+ risk
Cost-effectiveness — what published models estimate per unit of health impact
$/DALY
$27–29
WHO-CHOICE modeled
GiveWell
—
no GiveWell model
CE sources
2
Tier A · 39 studies
Source agreement
comparable
within 2.5×
Scope to country:All countries
Cost-effectiveness
Estimates are sourced in their native units and shown for comparison, not as literal costs. Sources use different frameworks — see each card for what it represents and how it was derived.
Modeled benchmarks ($/DALY)Tier A · standardized benchmark
WHO-CHOICE estimates are modeled at 50% population coverage, compared against the null set (no intervention) under generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. View WHO-CHOICE methodology →
$/DALY sources within 2.5x - treat as comparable, not ranked.
Modeled regional estimates — not realized delivery costs.
Published study estimates ($/DALY)Tier B · context only
Tufts GHCEA · 39 studies, varied methods — explore the spread, not a single number.
Health-system
$360
median · n=33
Mixed
$2,323
median · n=6
Filter the cohort
$434median of 39 studies · IQR $120–$807 · 5 cost-saving
Data completeness: not assessed (no country selected) · Evidence confidence: not assessed (no country selected)
Cost data mapped through broad sector classification — insufficient precision for intervention-specific interpretation. Context only.
Looking for supply/market data for Combination therapy for prevention of CVD in those with 30%+ risk? Select a country above, then open its intelligence page.